powered by

Latest News

MP says drop-off toll may be discriminatory

RSS Feed Submit a blog post

Page last updated: 16th Jul 2010 - 04:29 PM

The recent introduction of drop-off levies at various airports throughout the UK has met with complaints from much of the travelling public.

This week, however, the introduction at Belfast International Airport of a £1 toll for those dropping off or picking up friends or relatives has provoked an accusation by Democratic Unionist Assembly Member, Jonathan Bell, that the charge may in fact be of dubious legality.

His case rests on the grounds of possible discrimination against the elderly, disabled and families with young children who are less able to stick to the 10-minute limit allowed in the new zone. Anyone staying longer than the ten minutes allowed by the levy runs the risk of being clamped and having to pay an £80 fee to have their vehicle released.

Mr Bell said that there could be great risks involved if people started dropping off outside the zone to avoid paying the fee. A public representative has said that he intends writing to the Equality Commission and the Children’s Commission.

The airport cites security issues following the Glasgow bombing three years ago as the main driver for the new provisions. It is expected that a staggering £2 million a year will be raised in revenue from the charge, equivalent to one third of the airport's profits last year.

It transpires, however, that for cash-strapped travellers there is a way round the fee. The Consumer Council has announced that there is a 10-minute grace period in the long-stay car park and has urged motorists to take advantage of this, criticising the airport authorities for not having brought this into the public domain earlier.

Comments - 1


1. Gerard Corr

21st Aug 2010 - 10:28 AM

The £1 charge for drop off will of course generate very significant revenue for the Airport and not from the public purse as has been indicated by Mr Doran. However the charge is worong in and of itself for the following reasons

1 It is exploitative because there is no service being provided in addition to what the airport provided before the new route configuration in front of the airport terminal was constructed

2 While the new arrangement does create some physical distance between vehicles and the front entrance of the terminal building there is no need to charge drivers for the price of this construction beyond the period which will meet the bill for same

Accordingly, please advise what the length of this period is and please publish it in the press

The act will at least assuage the public's anger at being charged merely for leaving friends and relatives to the airport

Finally, I would be grateful for a personal response to these comments from Mr Doran

Thanking you


Gerard Corr

Report Comment